ניצן געשלעכט צו באַפרידיקן עטלעכע מענטשן ס געשלעכט פאַנטאַסיז און אינטערעס אין שיינקייט

The most surprising thing here is not the assumption that it may be reasonable to assert that some people are at a certain level of sexual risk and have pretty ביליק געשלעכט דאַלז. On the contrary, it is more worrying, which may be explained in the academic field. The conclusions and reasons for their lack of therapeutic benefit are completely lacking in either direction. This may reflect the nature of the author's theoretical understanding of the nature of sexual crimes. In other words, they cited the sociological concept of feminist sexual crimes and believed that this behavior was mainly driven by desire.

In theory, from this moral standpoint, Danaher is not the only prettyish doll and robot. It further proves the creation and dissemination of pretty sex dolls and robots, and also acknowledges the harm caused by the lack of objective personal materials. However, she cited reasoning related to "cultural harm", arguing that "allowing or even seeing the trade of abstract pretty sex dolls and robots is a sanction, promoting a public atmosphere that encourages the description of beauty as sexual objects, and Accept pretty abuse and normalize it".

Although this argument is logical, it is persuasive (and reflects the rest of the philosophical literature on pretty ליבע ליאַלקע and robots), it is presented in isolation and does not involve objections related to the prevention of pretty sexual abuse. Some professionals engaged in forensic health care have initially suggested that sex dolls and robots like beauty can play a role in preventing pretty sexual abuse.

This argument suggests that יאַפּאַניש געשלעכט ליאַלקע provide a way to vent without victims. Use sex to satisfy some people's sexual fantasies and interest in beauty. Although this possibility was mentioned in some of the philosophical papers cited above, it was quickly denied by suspicion, probably because the philosophical community had an inherent misunderstanding of the nature of this sexual interest and failed to conduct serious empirical research on it. Research. advantage.

Impose domination, power, and control, not gratification. Although a detailed discussion of this argument is beyond the scope of this review, we direct readers to each of the major multifactor models of sexual crimes used in forensic psychology research and practice; all of these include sexual interest or sexual arousal as The key causal component. The sex robot industry, and assess the potential health effects that may affect patient behavior and clinicians’ professional activities. Discussed the potential risks of using sex dolls and robots with Brown.

The clinical environment, although their literature search did not produce empirical studies for them to review. Reasons for these authors' defensive stance include police interest in אַנימע געשלעכט ליאַלקע, potential clinical prosecutions for providing illegal materials, and public perceptions of use in clinical settings. Dolls and robots are more likely to react negatively. This leads to recommendations not to include dolls and robots in clinical practice, as this will reduce the risk of impact that professionals face due to their use.